Nymograph

Omah: popularity and history

Explore how often Omah appears in published U.S. birth-name records. Counts describe recorded births, not how many people with this name are alive today.

Female records

Latest dataset year: 2025. Most recent published observation for this name: 1935, with 5 births and rank 4,729.

First published birth year
1884
Total published births, 1884–1935
150
Best annual rank
1,130 in 1884
Omah · annual births per 10,000 published births in this recorded-sex population
0.000.190.39188419101935

The line shows relative use, not raw counts. Gaps are unpublished observations. Open the interactive chart for exact annual values.

Explore Omah: charts, comparisons, maps and PDF reports →

Published observations

Up to ten most recent published years, newest first. These may not be consecutive or recent calendar years. Missing records are unknown, not zero.

Omah · female records · most recent published years
YearBirthsRank
193554,729
193364,109
193154,817
192955,101
192883,674
192783,784
192655,434
192555,583
192364,832
192255,592
Latest ten dataset years (2016–2025)

Not published means no released observation; it does not establish zero births.

Omah · female records · latest calendar years, including gaps
YearBirthsRank
2025Not publishedNot published
2024Not publishedNot published
2023Not publishedNot published
2022Not publishedNot published
2021Not publishedNot published
2020Not publishedNot published
2019Not publishedNot published
2018Not publishedNot published
2017Not publishedNot published
2016Not publishedNot published

Nearby spellings in the directory

Alphabetical neighbors, not evidence of shared meaning, origin or popularity. Each spelling has its own recorded history.

Browse names starting with O

How to read these figures

An absent observation is not zero: small counts are withheld, and no published count may mean no births or a suppressed count. Early years are less complete. Recorded sex is a source category, not a rule about who may use a name. Annual ranks order published counts, with alphabetical tie-breaking. National and state totals need not match.

These records describe usage. They do not establish a name’s meaning, origin, ethnicity or pronunciation.