Nymograph

Lisbet: popularity and history

Explore how often Lisbet appears in published U.S. birth-name records. Counts describe recorded births, not how many people with this name are alive today.

Female records

Latest dataset year: 2025. Most recent published observation for this name: 2019, with 6 births and rank 14,853.

First published birth year
1958
Total published births, 1958–2019
973
Best annual rank
1,448 in 2002
Lisbet · annual births per 10,000 published births in this recorded-sex population
0.000.370.73195819882019

The line shows relative use, not raw counts. Gaps are unpublished observations. Open the interactive chart for exact annual values.

Explore Lisbet: charts, comparisons, maps and PDF reports →

Published observations

Up to ten most recent published years, newest first. These may not be consecutive or recent calendar years. Missing records are unknown, not zero.

Lisbet · female records · most recent published years
YearBirthsRank
2019614,853
2015713,879
2014615,763
2013518,180
2012812,921
2011812,883
2010158,130
2009314,760
2008275,381
2007245,823
Latest ten dataset years (2016–2025)

Not published means no released observation; it does not establish zero births.

Lisbet · female records · latest calendar years, including gaps
YearBirthsRank
2025Not publishedNot published
2024Not publishedNot published
2023Not publishedNot published
2022Not publishedNot published
2021Not publishedNot published
2020Not publishedNot published
2019614,853
2018Not publishedNot published
2017Not publishedNot published
2016Not publishedNot published

Nearby spellings in the directory

Alphabetical neighbors, not evidence of shared meaning, origin or popularity. Each spelling has its own recorded history.

Browse names starting with L

How to read these figures

An absent observation is not zero: small counts are withheld, and no published count may mean no births or a suppressed count. Early years are less complete. Recorded sex is a source category, not a rule about who may use a name. Annual ranks order published counts, with alphabetical tie-breaking. National and state totals need not match.

These records describe usage. They do not establish a name’s meaning, origin, ethnicity or pronunciation.