Nymograph

Lakyla: popularity and history

Explore how often Lakyla appears in published U.S. birth-name records. Counts describe recorded births, not how many people with this name are alive today.

Female records

Latest dataset year: 2025. Most recent published observation for this name: 2024, with 6 births and rank 14,463.

First published birth year
1999
Total published births, 1999–2024
123
Best annual rank
9,175 in 2009
Lakyla · annual births per 10,000 published births in this recorded-sex population
0.000.040.07199920122024

The line shows relative use, not raw counts. Gaps are unpublished observations. Open the interactive chart for exact annual values.

Explore Lakyla: charts, comparisons, maps and PDF reports →

Published observations

Up to ten most recent published years, newest first. These may not be consecutive or recent calendar years. Missing records are unknown, not zero.

Lakyla · female records · most recent published years
YearBirthsRank
2024614,463
2013812,643
2011911,732
20101010,869
2009139,175
2008616,577
20071011,281
2006813,056
20051010,581
2004713,548
Latest ten dataset years (2016–2025)

Not published means no released observation; it does not establish zero births.

Lakyla · female records · latest calendar years, including gaps
YearBirthsRank
2025Not publishedNot published
2024614,463
2023Not publishedNot published
2022Not publishedNot published
2021Not publishedNot published
2020Not publishedNot published
2019Not publishedNot published
2018Not publishedNot published
2017Not publishedNot published
2016Not publishedNot published

Nearby spellings in the directory

Alphabetical neighbors, not evidence of shared meaning, origin or popularity. Each spelling has its own recorded history.

Browse names starting with L

How to read these figures

An absent observation is not zero: small counts are withheld, and no published count may mean no births or a suppressed count. Early years are less complete. Recorded sex is a source category, not a rule about who may use a name. Annual ranks order published counts, with alphabetical tie-breaking. National and state totals need not match.

These records describe usage. They do not establish a name’s meaning, origin, ethnicity or pronunciation.