Nymograph

Ioma: popularity and history

Explore how often Ioma appears in published U.S. birth-name records. Counts describe recorded births, not how many people with this name are alive today.

Female records

Latest dataset year: 2025. Most recent published observation for this name: 1956, with 6 births and rank 5,545.

First published birth year
1900
Total published births, 1900–1956
222
Best annual rank
1,753 in 1908
Ioma · annual births per 10,000 published births in this recorded-sex population
0.000.100.21190019281956

The line shows relative use, not raw counts. Gaps are unpublished observations. Open the interactive chart for exact annual values.

Explore Ioma: charts, comparisons, maps and PDF reports →

Published observations

Up to ten most recent published years, newest first. These may not be consecutive or recent calendar years. Missing records are unknown, not zero.

Ioma · female records · most recent published years
YearBirthsRank
195665,545
194054,643
193883,295
193554,501
193464,015
193373,566
193264,119
193164,087
193054,857
192954,896
Latest ten dataset years (2016–2025)

Not published means no released observation; it does not establish zero births.

Ioma · female records · latest calendar years, including gaps
YearBirthsRank
2025Not publishedNot published
2024Not publishedNot published
2023Not publishedNot published
2022Not publishedNot published
2021Not publishedNot published
2020Not publishedNot published
2019Not publishedNot published
2018Not publishedNot published
2017Not publishedNot published
2016Not publishedNot published

Nearby spellings in the directory

Alphabetical neighbors, not evidence of shared meaning, origin or popularity. Each spelling has its own recorded history.

Browse names starting with I

How to read these figures

An absent observation is not zero: small counts are withheld, and no published count may mean no births or a suppressed count. Early years are less complete. Recorded sex is a source category, not a rule about who may use a name. Annual ranks order published counts, with alphabetical tie-breaking. National and state totals need not match.

These records describe usage. They do not establish a name’s meaning, origin, ethnicity or pronunciation.