Nymograph

Aracelly: popularity and history

Explore how often Aracelly appears in published U.S. birth-name records. Counts describe recorded births, not how many people with this name are alive today.

Female records

Latest dataset year: 2025. Most recent published observation for this name: 2017, with 5 births and rank 16,135.

First published birth year
1971
Total published births, 1971–2017
128
Best annual rank
8,405 in 1971
Aracelly · annual births per 10,000 published births in this recorded-sex population
0.000.030.06197119942017

The line shows relative use, not raw counts. Gaps are unpublished observations. Open the interactive chart for exact annual values.

Explore Aracelly: charts, comparisons, maps and PDF reports →

Published observations

Up to ten most recent published years, newest first. These may not be consecutive or recent calendar years. Missing records are unknown, not zero.

Aracelly · female records · most recent published years
YearBirthsRank
2017516,135
2015811,946
2011119,789
2009911,558
2008713,996
2007714,079
2006119,978
2005811,956
2004516,359
2003712,543
Latest ten dataset years (2016–2025)

Not published means no released observation; it does not establish zero births.

Aracelly · female records · latest calendar years, including gaps
YearBirthsRank
2025Not publishedNot published
2024Not publishedNot published
2023Not publishedNot published
2022Not publishedNot published
2021Not publishedNot published
2020Not publishedNot published
2019Not publishedNot published
2018Not publishedNot published
2017516,135
2016Not publishedNot published

Nearby spellings in the directory

Alphabetical neighbors, not evidence of shared meaning, origin or popularity. Each spelling has its own recorded history.

Browse names starting with A

How to read these figures

An absent observation is not zero: small counts are withheld, and no published count may mean no births or a suppressed count. Early years are less complete. Recorded sex is a source category, not a rule about who may use a name. Annual ranks order published counts, with alphabetical tie-breaking. National and state totals need not match.

These records describe usage. They do not establish a name’s meaning, origin, ethnicity or pronunciation.