Nymograph

Aracelis: popularity and history

Explore how often Aracelis appears in published U.S. birth-name records. Counts describe recorded births, not how many people with this name are alive today.

Female records

Latest dataset year: 2025. Most recent published observation for this name: 2025, with 13 births and rank 7,930.

First published birth year
1955
Total published births, 1955–2025
1,102
Best annual rank
2,064 in 1960
Aracelis · annual births per 10,000 published births in this recorded-sex population
0.000.110.21195519902025

The line shows relative use, not raw counts. Gaps are unpublished observations. Open the interactive chart for exact annual values.

Explore Aracelis: charts, comparisons, maps and PDF reports →

Published observations

Up to ten most recent published years, newest first. These may not be consecutive or recent calendar years. Missing records are unknown, not zero.

Aracelis · female records · most recent published years
YearBirthsRank
2025137,930
2024613,649
2023910,408
2021910,375
2019613,997
2018811,522
2016119,481
2015713,147
2013138,626
2012615,158
Latest ten dataset years (2016–2025)

Not published means no released observation; it does not establish zero births.

Aracelis · female records · latest calendar years, including gaps
YearBirthsRank
2025137,930
2024613,649
2023910,408
2022Not publishedNot published
2021910,375
2020Not publishedNot published
2019613,997
2018811,522
2017Not publishedNot published
2016119,481

Nearby spellings in the directory

Alphabetical neighbors, not evidence of shared meaning, origin or popularity. Each spelling has its own recorded history.

Browse names starting with A

How to read these figures

An absent observation is not zero: small counts are withheld, and no published count may mean no births or a suppressed count. Early years are less complete. Recorded sex is a source category, not a rule about who may use a name. Annual ranks order published counts, with alphabetical tie-breaking. National and state totals need not match.

These records describe usage. They do not establish a name’s meaning, origin, ethnicity or pronunciation.