Nymograph

Abegail: popularity and history

Explore how often Abegail appears in published U.S. birth-name records. Counts describe recorded births, not how many people with this name are alive today.

Female records

Latest dataset year: 2025. Most recent published observation for this name: 2019, with 7 births and rank 12,456.

First published birth year
1981
Total published births, 1981–2019
515
Best annual rank
3,665 in 2000
Abegail · annual births per 10,000 published births in this recorded-sex population
0.000.100.19198120002019

The line shows relative use, not raw counts. Gaps are unpublished observations. Open the interactive chart for exact annual values.

Explore Abegail: charts, comparisons, maps and PDF reports →

Published observations

Up to ten most recent published years, newest first. These may not be consecutive or recent calendar years. Missing records are unknown, not zero.

Abegail · female records · most recent published years
YearBirthsRank
2019712,456
2018910,551
2017128,785
2016712,890
2014128,974
20131010,244
2012186,875
2011177,120
2010265,247
2009226,093
Latest ten dataset years (2016–2025)

Not published means no released observation; it does not establish zero births.

Abegail · female records · latest calendar years, including gaps
YearBirthsRank
2025Not publishedNot published
2024Not publishedNot published
2023Not publishedNot published
2022Not publishedNot published
2021Not publishedNot published
2020Not publishedNot published
2019712,456
2018910,551
2017128,785
2016712,890

Nearby spellings in the directory

Alphabetical neighbors, not evidence of shared meaning, origin or popularity. Each spelling has its own recorded history.

Browse names starting with A

How to read these figures

An absent observation is not zero: small counts are withheld, and no published count may mean no births or a suppressed count. Early years are less complete. Recorded sex is a source category, not a rule about who may use a name. Annual ranks order published counts, with alphabetical tie-breaking. National and state totals need not match.

These records describe usage. They do not establish a name’s meaning, origin, ethnicity or pronunciation.